By David N. Harding, Staff Writer

For years, Americans have been told to fear “toxic masculinity.” Boys are taught to suppress their aggression, their competitiveness, and their desire to lead—all traits historically celebrated as cornerstones of strong men. But while the term toxic masculinity has dominated mainstream discourse, its inverse has gone largely unchallenged: toxic femininity. And it’s quietly undermining the cultural bedrock of American strength.
Toxic femininity is not about women—it’s about the feminization of culture at the expense of reason, merit, and masculine virtue. It rewards hypersensitivity over resilience, emotional performance over critical thinking, and victimhood over personal responsibility. In this climate, manhood is no longer something to be developed, respected, or celebrated—it’s something to be apologized for.
How the LGBTQ+ Movement Helped Redefine Masculinity
At the epicenter of this cultural shift is the radical wing of the LGBTQ+ movement, which has gone far beyond calls for equal treatment and entered the realm of aggressive gender redefinition. Biological facts have become taboo. The idea of manhood itself is increasingly portrayed as a social construct to be deconstructed, not a biological identity to be embraced.
Traditional masculine traits—strength, leadership, protectiveness—are now often framed as relics of “patriarchy” or signs of “toxic dominance.” In 2019, the American Psychological Association released guidelines declaring that “traditional masculinity is psychologically harmful” (APA). This wasn’t a fringe opinion—it was institutional dogma. From academia to entertainment, men are encouraged to be more passive, less assertive, and above all, more emotionally pliable.
Even male athletes and military figures are now expected to align with ever-evolving cultural narratives about gender identity. Disagree, and you’re labeled bigoted or backwards. The result? A generation of confused young men, unsure of their place in a society that treats masculinity as a liability.
The Military and the War on Grit
Few institutions reflect a nation’s strength like its military. And yet under the former administration, military recruitment campaigns emphasized inclusivity, emotional sensitivity, and gender diversity over combat readiness. A 2021 U.S. Army ad highlighted a female soldier raised by two moms, focusing on her “march for equality” and desire to “shatter stereotypes” (CNN). It was more social justice biography than warfighter recruitment.
While representation matters, the messaging in such campaigns missed the mark. The armed forces exist to deter enemies and win wars—not to mirror social trends. Meanwhile, adversaries like China and Russia are not conducting gender sensitivity training for their troops. Their recruitment materials project power, discipline, and martial pride (The Hill).
This shift in priorities raises a serious question: Are we preparing soldiers for TikTok or for the battlefield?
The Cost to a Generation of Boys
The war on masculinity is not confined to the Pentagon. Across the country, boys are struggling—and few seem willing to talk about it. American boys are falling behind in education, mental health, and self-worth. According to the CDC, teen boys are experiencing record levels of depression and suicide, with young men now far more likely to die by suicide than their female peers (CDC Data Brief).
Colleges, once male-dominated, now enroll significantly more women than men. A 2021 report revealed that women make up nearly 60% of college students, while men are becoming increasingly disengaged from academic life (Wall Street Journal). Many boys grow up in homes or classrooms where their natural tendencies—roughhousing, risk-taking, competition—are punished rather than redirected. They’re told to sit still, be quiet, and talk about their feelings. And when they don’t conform, they’re medicated or marginalized.
This isn’t education—it’s emasculation.
Culture of Fragility, Collapse of Strength
The cultural exaltation of fragility isn’t just harmful—it’s dangerous. A society that denigrates its warriors and elevates its whiners cannot survive external threats. As author Abigail Shrier points out, “We are cultivating fragility in boys, and then wondering why they are not becoming strong men” (Shrier Interview). When men are conditioned to suppress their instinct to protect, defend, and assert, society loses its shield.
Toxic femininity insists that emotions should override evidence, that inclusion should trump competence, and that masculinity itself must be reengineered. But when the power goes out, the enemy breaches the wire, or the chaos hits the streets, society won’t be calling for more empathy. It will be calling for strong men.
A Path Forward: Restore Balance, Not Blame
It’s time to stop pretending that masculinity is a problem that needs to be solved. Masculinity, rightly channeled, is a gift. It’s the force that builds, protects, and sacrifices. It’s the strength behind every firefighter charging into flames, every father standing between danger and his child, every soldier willing to die for his country.
We don’t need more weak men trying to be emotionally palatable. We need men who are strong in mind, body, and spirit—who know how to lead with courage and love with conviction. The solution isn’t to reject femininity, but to reject the toxic version of it that seeks to erase manhood altogether.
America will not survive the softening of its sons. It’s time to raise men again.
#ToxicFemininity #CultureWar #MasculinityMatters #MilitaryStrength #RaiseMenAgain
Add comment
Comments